Pros and Cons of the Accelerated Patent

The Accelerated Patent Examination process is not for everyone. However, for those in the technology and manufacturing sectors, who intend to introduce or produce new products every 12-14 months, this process can add great value to the worth of your product. While there are cons to the Accelerated Patent process, Berenato & White works closely with clients to mitigate or eliminate them when it makes sense for a client to pursue accelerated patent examination.

Here’s a brief overview of the pros and cons of accelerated patent examination:

Pros

  • Early certainty that a patent brings to protect your company's inventions.
  • Help attract and retain investors by increasing the asset value of your company’s inventions.
  • Can strengthen your company’s offensive and defensive position in your market space.
  • Proactively addresses the tremendous backlog of patent applications at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), which can translate into years’ worth of saved time and money.
  • Can synchronize patent rights formation with product development and introduction.
  • Patent protection can come in as little as six months, along with greater certainty of prosecution cost and outcome.
  • An applicant seeking examination without special status may end up having to comply with many of the more burdensome procedures involved in an accelerated patent without the benefits.

Cons

  • There can be strict procedural and substantive requirements and litigation risks, which need to be considered and weighed against the potential benefits.
  • Only non-reissue utility or design applications filed under 35 U.S.C. [section] 111(a) on or after August 25, 2006 are eligible.
  • 12-month turnaround time of accelerated patent is not a guarantee.
  • The expedited goal of 12 months applies only if the applicant files a grantable petition to make special.
  • An applicant under the accelerated examination program is required to conduct a search of the prior art, submit all prior art that is closest to the invention, and explain what the prior art teaches and how the invention is different.
  • An applicant must be able to explain how the invention is useful and must show how the written description supports the claimed invention.
  • Accelerated patent process limits the number of claims in each application, and the claims must be directed to a single invention.
  • The program shortens the time for responding to most USPTO communications and no extensions are permitted.
  • There is no provision for withdrawal from special status once granted.
  • Accelerated examination limits the number of claims to 20, with a maximum of three independent claims

The B & W Difference

Video: 

             Patent Law Institute

             John White will co-chair PLI's 6th Annual Patent Law Institute, scheduled for February 16-17, 2012 in New York
             (and via live webcast) and March 19-20, 2012 in San FranciscoProgram and speakers (PDF).